Arguing Separate but Equal: A Study of Argumentation in Public Single-Sex Science Classes in the United States
Keywords:
single-sex education, middle school, argumentation, public schooling, gender differences, equityAbstract
Amended federal regulations have attempted to expand the circumstances in which single-sex classes are permissible in public schools in the United States. Applying a grounded theory methodology, this ethnographic study investigated students’ grades and the discursive practice of argumentation in an all-boy and an all-girl science class taught by the same teacher at a public co-educational middle school in the United States to explore whether they learned the same science. Although the classes received similar grades, the boys gained greater exposure to argumentation, a skill that could assist them in future science pursuits. The emerging theory is that single-sex settings can construct differences between the sexes, possibly aiding the development or maintenance of differences between boys’ and girls’ interest and performance in science. This study highlights the concern that the recent increase in single-sex offerings in the United States could impact equity goals and gender-related outcomes.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
