Investigating Students’ Academic Self-Concepts and Persistence in STEM: How Do Gender Differences Relate to Female Representation?
Keywords:
Gender, academic self-concept, higher education, STEM, persistence, gender compositionAbstract
The research literature often treats STEM subjects as a homogeneous group despite considerable differences in gender composition. This article examines gender differences in students’ academic self-concepts across STEM fields with different shares of female students, and how students’ academic self-concepts affect their graduation likelihood. This paper argues that gender disparities in STEM students’ academic self-concepts favour male students and systematically relate to gender composition in the respective subject. Using student-cohort data from the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS), I performed regression analyses to predict students’ academic self-concepts and their likelihood of graduating. The study revealed that female students exhibit weaker academic self-concepts only in fields with either low (< 30%) or high (> 50%) female representation, with the latter presenting the larger gender gap. Moreover, students’ academic self-concepts relate to their graduation likelihood in STEM fields with low female presentation. The research underscores the necessity of distinguishing between STEM fields when examining gender disparities in academic self-concepts, challenging the prevalent view of treating STEM as a uniform group.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).