Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
G S T Logo
Special Issue: Political objects: Prescriptions, injustices and promises of material agents
Published: 20-11-2017

Practices of modest recuperation: Food, situated knowledge, and the politics of respect

University of Tampere

Marja Vehviläinen

University Lecturer

Faculty of Social Sciences, Gender Studies

Situated knowledge companion species politics of respect feminist food politics non-governmental organizations material-discursive practices of food


This article discusses food as a political object through an analysis of the practices of two non-governmental organizations that work with food production and the associated production of knowledge. Donna Haraway’s notions of situated knowledge, companion species, and the politics of respect are employed to build the methodological framework for the analysis. The analysis employs a qualitative empirical study of a large Finnish women’s organization working in the field of home economics, and a complementary study of an East London based feminist environmental organization. Both organizations work through local groups. Firstly, the article examines how these groups work with practices of food production, using the case of composting as an example. Composting food leftovers utilizes networks of companion species and their bio-socio-technical apparatuses across the globe, including–but not limited to–soil, worms, and waste management companies. Secondly, it shows how situated knowledge is produced by connecting research based knowledge and the experience based knowledge generated through material practices of food production and use. Finally, it discusses the ways in which communally produced situated knowledge facilitates the politics of respect in everyday practices of food production via networks of companion species for modest recuperation.

How to Cite

Vehviläinen, M. (2017). Practices of modest recuperation: Food, situated knowledge, and the politics of respect. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 9(2), 159–177. Retrieved from