“That Shocked Me”: Physiological Arousal when Confronting Implicit Gender/STEM Biases
Keywords:
Pre-service Teachers, Physiological Data, Implicit Biases, Gender, STEM, Teacher Education, Electrodermal ActivityAbstract
Gendered differences in the “leaky STEM pipeline” start in the early grades. One explanation may be the implicit biases teachers hold regarding who does and does not belong in STEM disciplines. As a result, many teacher preparation programs provide pre-service teachers opportunities to discuss and confront their implicit biases. However, individuals do not always respond positively to these opportunities. The nature of this defensive response needs to be examined to support pre-service educators in confronting implicit gender biases so they can provide all students access to high quality STEM careers.
In this pilot study, we examined pre-service teachers’ (n = 20) electrodermal activity, a physiological indicator of sympathetic nervous system arousal, during both the Gender/STEM implicit association test and a control activity. Our findings suggest that participants found it more cognitively demanding to associate “Female” with “Science” than to associate “Males” with “Science,” that they experienced a greater physiological stress response while receiving feedback on their implicit biases than at baseline, and that the difference in both factors related to their scores on the IAT. These findings are a first step towards understanding and overcoming the barriers preservice teachers face when confronting these biases.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
