Surveying the Campus Climate for Faculty: A Comparison of the Assessments of STEM and non-STEM faculty
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e195/6e19558680d3360c19d168460bf67bab0a07b802" alt="G S T logo"
Abstract
A fundamental assumption of programs intended to increase the numbers of women faculty in science, engineering and math (STEM) has been that women in these disciplines experience a uniquely hostile climate. While this focus on STEM faculty is necessary and important, we argue that it may be too narrow.& In this paper, we compare STEM to non-STEM faculty, drawing on a representative survey of university faculty in one institution (N=612) conducted in 2007. Our findings indicate that non-white men in the STEM disciplines are in fact significantly less satisfied than white men in these fields and less satisfied than their counterparts in non-STEM fields.& Among white women, those in STEM fields are significantly less satisfied than those in non-STEM disciplines. These differences are largely mediated by perceptions of work and contextual factors, however.& With a few exceptions, we find that the factors that predict satisfaction are the same across groups of faculty.& This implies that efforts to improve university and departmental climates will benefit all faculty.
&
Keywords
job satisfaction, career progress satisfaction, gender, race/ethnicity
Author Biography
Dana M. Britton
Professor of Sociology
Chardie L. Baird
Assistant Professor of Sociology