Re-Engineering the “Leaky Pipeline” Metaphor: Diversifying the Pool by Teaching STEM “by Stealth”

Theresa Petray; Tanya Doyle; Elise Howard; Rhian Morgan; Ryl Harrison

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2019)

Special Issue:Gender and Intersectionality in Engineering

Re-Engineering the “Leaky Pipeline” Metaphor: Diversifying the Pool by Teaching STEM “by Stealth”

Published 14-06-2019

Theresa Petray
Tanya Doyle
Elise Howard
Rhian Morgan
Ryl Harrison

Theresa Petray
College of Arts, Society & Education James Cook University

Tanya Doyle
College of Arts, Society & Education James Cook University

Elise Howard
Australian National University

Rhian Morgan
Learning, Teaching & Student Engagement James Cook University

Ryl Harrison
James Cook University

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite

Re-Engineering the “Leaky Pipeline” Metaphor: Diversifying the Pool by Teaching STEM “by Stealth”. (2019). International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 11(1), 10-29. https://genderandset.open.ac.uk/index.php/genderandset/article/view/582

Download Citation

Abstract

Many attempts to engage diverse audiences in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) target students already enrolled or interested in STEM subjects. This paper presents qualitative findings on the characteristics and experiences of high school girls who participated in a STEM engagement programme involving drone-flying camps in two locations in regional northern Australia. As expected, the programme attracted students with a STEM interest, yet close to half of the participants named arts and humanities as their favourite subject areas. Our research suggests that engagement activities that primarily target students who already enjoy STEM will inhibit the capacity to attract diverse engineers. Programmes engaging with girls who do not identify as the “STEM type” may broaden engineering recruitment outcomes. Moreover, reimagining STEM beyond the boundaries of the traditional “hard sciences” works to overcome stereotyping that begins early in life (Bond, 2016; Kessels, 2015). We argue that the “pipeline” metaphor is part of the problem: it implies a singular pathway into engineering that is shaped by narrow curricular concepts of STEM education. Instead, we suggest that engineering disciplines should consider recruiting from a “deep pool”–one that recognises and values the dispositions generated through engagement with creative and critical curricula.

Keywords

gender equity, intersectionality, leaky pipeline, STEM engagement, drone-flying camps

PDF

Author Biography

Theresa Petray

Senior Lecturer in Sociology & Anthropology

Tanya Doyle

Lecturer in Education

Rhian Morgan

Lecturer, Pathway Programs

Ryl Harrison

Strategic Policy Advisor